Yes, in order to submit a proposal, you must be a current AJS individual member.
Login to MyAJS to renew your membership or to enroll as a new AJS member.
If you are not sure whether you have already renewed for this year, please contact Melinda Man at mman@associationforjewishstudies.org.
If you are submitting a session proposal, please confirm that every participant is also a current member of the AJS before submitting.
The AJS welcomes scholars whose primary research is outside the field but whose work has a direct impact on Jewish Studies and whose participation would enhance the conference. The AJS may waive the membership requirement for a limited number of session participants who are not academics (e.g. journalists, authors, filmmakers, etc.), and whose participation is considered essential for the integrity of the session to which they were invited. Requests for a membership fee waiver must be submitted by the session organizer to the AJS by submitting this request form no later than April 20, 2024. Membership dues waiver recipients must still pay the registration fee for the conference as the AJS does not offer registration waivers.
Yes, you can submit to participate in a maximum of two sessions, as long as they are not both individual papers, both papers on panels, both papers on lightning rounds, or one individual paper and one paper on a panel/lightning round.
The paper abstracts, written by the individual scholars but submitted by the session organizer, should explain the presentation’s purpose, methodology, sources, argument and specific contribution to scholarship in the field. Sample session abstracts, sample individual paper abstracts, and workshops on how to write abstracts can be found on the AJS website.
Note: Accepted abstracts will be made public on the conference program site.
Submitters must acknowledge the following:
• The session meets the minimum diversity requirement by having at least one presenter who does not identify as a cis-male.
• No one in the proposed session (nor an individual submitter) has submitted more than two proposals in any of the formats. If anyone has made two submissions, they are not both individual papers, both paper submissions for a panel, both paper submissions for a lightning session, or an individual paper and a paper as part of a panel/lightning round.
• The proposed session has a diversity of academic ranks and institutional affiliations (and no one on the panel is an undergraduate student.)
• None of the parts of the session (nor an individual paper submission) have been previously published or presented in whole or in part elsewhere and are not sessions that summarize the proceedings of another conference.
• The session (or individual paper submission) is not organized around recently published books. If it is structured around arguments and/or methods found in recent scholarly publications, the abstract clearly states what new intervention or data the session panel will offer.
• The chair or moderator of the session isn't also a presenter in the same session.
• The proposed session or paper is not dedicated to the memory of a scholar or in honor of a scholar. If the session is organized around a scholar’s academic works, the abstract clearly and explicitly states how the session will discuss the scholar’s contribution to the academy.
• The submission is in English.
• The session organizer has indicated the languages in which the presenters will be speaking (from the list of options) and the time slots when the group will be available (noting that the conference will be scheduled in Eastern Time.)
If your session is not already complete or you are looking for a panel proposal to join, take a look at the current list of people and ideas looking for session matches, and submit your incomplete session or individual paper idea here to be added to the list.* You also should contact the division chairs in your primary and secondary division; they may be able to help connect you with other scholars in your field.
*Please note: Sharing an idea for a session or paper through this forum DOES NOT constitute a submitted proposal for the conference program. Only complete proposals submitted through the AJS Conference Submission Site will be considered for inclusion in the conference program.
The chair is responsible for starting the session on time, introducing the speakers, keeping them to their allotted time, and moderating the Q and A. Ensuring equal time for all presenters is essential, and chairs must be prepared to end a presentation that exceeds the allotted time. All panel, seminar, and lightning session proposals must include a chairperson; paper presenters may not chair a session in which they are presenting.
The moderator will pose the questions and control the time given to each discussant to respond during a roundtable. In order to make for an informed and lively dialogue, moderators should email questions to discussants at least two weeks before the conference, and ask discussants to prepare short responses for each. All roundtable proposals must include a moderator.
A respondent addresses wider-ranging reflections of the issues raised in the papers. In traditional panels, respondents will have about ten minutes for their comments.
Yes. There is an area in the proposal submission process to indicate the session sponsor (e.g. academic institution, research center/archive, learned society, or AJS caucus or working group.) These sessions must be accepted through the regular submission process.
Click the image for a larger version.
-(2).png?sfvrsn=4de3b70a_0 "What happens to my submission_ (3) (2)")
Proposals will first be sent for review to the Division Chair/s. Division Chair(s) review the submissions that are submitted in a specific subject area, as the Primary Division (for example, the proposals submitted to the Holocaust Studies Division are reviewed first by the current Holocaust Studies Division Chairs).
Division Chairs evaluate paper and session proposals based on criteria including contribution to the field, originality, methodology, and clarity of expression. Division Chairs are also looking for a diversity of participants both in submitted session proposals and when organizing sessions out of individual proposals.
When evaluating an individual paper proposal, division chairs will recommend either acceptance or rejection. If recommending acceptance, they will then try to place the proposal in a session with other individual submissions. Division Chairs also evaluate session proposals and make recommendations for acceptance or rejection.
Division Chairs then rank the sessions they have recommended accepting. If your proposal has been rejected but you indicated a "Secondary Division Option'' during submission, your proposal will be automatically transferred to the secondary division's division chair(s) for review.
The AJS Program Committee is a multi-disciplinary panel of experts in Jewish Studies that meets in early June to review recommendations from Primary and Secondary Division Chairs and to make final decisions for the entire conference program. The Program Committee may shift submissions to any Division so please be advised that the Division(s) that you selected during submission are subject to change during the review process.
The Program Committee also attempts to find a place for individual papers that the Division Chairs accepted but could not place into sessions.
Confirmation of your proposal’s receipt will be emailed to the submitter. This email will come from DO_NOT_REPLY@allacademic.com so please be sure to check your spam folder. If you cannot locate it there, please contact the AJS office (marnstein@associationforjewishstudies.org) before the submission deadline to confirm that your proposal was received. AJS cannot accept proposals submitted after the deadline.
The AJS office will notify you of decisions on behalf of the Program Committee by email by late-August. These emails will come from the following email sender: do_not_reply@allacademic.com, so please check your junk mail folder if you don’t see an acceptance notification in your inbox.
